All capabilities
Robot Fleet Witness Shared-family mapped

Witness Hold

Still-Human Hold: The Person the Fleet Never Logged

Notices a person standing or kneeling perfectly still inside a robot zone — the person no machine log ever records.

Readiness Shared-family mapped

Mapped to a shared offline runtime family and usable with a recording or compatible ESP32 CSI stream.

Evidence Strong theory Supported hypothesis

Published physics or adjacent results support the hypothesis; capability-specific product and site validation are still required.

Runtime family Presence

Calibrated motion and presence score from CSI variance and change statistics.

When no ESP32 is connected

No compatible ESP32 stream is connected. Use the bundled Fleet recording; it demonstrates the shared Presence runtime, not independent proof of this capability.

Intended capability

Pilot this intended outcome through the shared Presence family, then validate it against site-specific ground truth: Holds the presence of a motionless human inside an autonomous operating zone — the maintenance tech kneeling in an aisle, the picker who stepped over the chain — via aimed mmWave cones on the zones' human-exclusion volumes, and records presence-during-machine-motion intervals as evidence events. This is the nightmare case by the fatality record: US robot-fatality studies covering 1992-2017 put most robot-related deaths near a stationary machine's envelope, with the victim's presence in no machine log — and CSI fades on exactly that person. The row is an evidence layer, never a safety function: the certified stack — fences, E-stops, safety PLCs — remains authoritative, and every event this row emits says so.

This describes the intended outcome. Readiness is shared-family mapped, evidence is class B, and a catalog mapping or recording is not proof of this outcome at a real site.

Solution blueprint

See the environment before installing it.

This exact kit is one of 191 first-class designs. It includes geometry, objects, nodes, wording, scenarios, installation, limitations, and catalog-bound readiness.

Shared-family mapped

No rendered revision is available yet.

Bundled recording

A related Fleet scene

This is one recorded vertical scenario. It is not separate validation of every capability in the catalog.

01 The physics

The LD2410C cone (bench-proven 2026-08-10) holds a stationary human to ~6 m, ±60°, via breathing micro-motion at 24 GHz — mm-scale chest displacement resolvable at a 12.5 mm wavelength — with ms latency and no dependence on the 2.4 GHz field. The sensor reports one composite target, no azimuth, no count; a metal chassis transiting the cone dominates the return and collapses 'still human plus moving robot' into 'moving target', so robot-transit windows are declared no-assessment intervals on CSI evidence alone — the estate feed may only add no-assessment windows, never attest robot absence or open assessment. CSI supplies the surrounding motion context; the cone supplies the hold CSI cannot.

02 Shared processing path

LD2410 static-target energy + per-gate range readout on the aimed cone (the hold) -> robot-transit masking gate (CSI machine-motion evidence in the cone's zone marks no-assessment windows; estate data may add windows, never open assessment) -> presence-interval assembly with dwell hysteresis -> join against CSI machine-motion verdicts in the same zone -> presence-during-motion event with range-gate evidence, filed to the ledger and certificate stream.

This is a capability design path. Components may be shared with other catalog entries; it is not presented as a unique algorithm.

03 Validation plan

Bench and site protocol extending the 2026-08-10 LD2410C validation: stationary and breath-slowing subjects at 1-6 m across cone angles; robot-transit masking characterization with an AMR crossing at set ranges, including the human-tuned firmware's response to robot targets; false-hold rate against empty cells and against parked powered machinery — spinning lidar, fans, servo hold dither — over a multi-day soak.

04 Commercial hypothesis

'Witness Hold' — for the EHS director who has read the fatality statistics: an independent record that a human was inside the envelope while the machine moved, made by sensors that owe nothing to the machine.