The evidence is proven or strong, but this capability still needs a capability-specific ESP32 or Rust runtime adapter.
Intended capability
Validate this target only after a capability-specific adapter and ground-truth study exist: An armed-home intrusion mode that stays quiet for the cat and the robot vacuum: velocity, band-shape and mass-proxy filtering on top of the proven intrusion detector.
This describes the intended outcome. Readiness is needs edge adapter, evidence is class B, and a catalog mapping or recording is not proof of this outcome at a real site.
Solution blueprint
See the environment before installing it.
This exact kit is one of 191 first-class designs. It includes geometry, objects, nodes, wording, scenarios, installation, limitations, and catalog-bound readiness.
No rendered revision is available yet.
Bundled recording
A related Home scene
This is one recorded vertical scenario. It is not separate validation of every capability in the catalog.
01 The physics
Humans produce broadband quasi-periodic gait micro-Doppler (1-3Hz cadence with harmonics, high total perturbation); small pets produce brief, low-mass, higher-cadence transients with far smaller multipath displacement; robot vacuums produce narrowband constant-velocity lines with motor harmonics — three separable band signatures.
02 Shared processing path
Intrusion family detector unchanged -> parallel band-shape classifier (human gait comb vs small-scatterer transient vs machine line) using the edge Doppler summary -> alarm gate requires human class + sustained track; pet/robot events logged, never alarmed.
This is a capability design path. Components may be shared with other catalog entries; it is not presented as a unique algorithm.
03 Validation plan
Own-hardware homes with dogs/cats/robot vacuums: 4 weeks armed-away, report false-alarm rate vs the non-gated baseline and staged-entry detection latency delta (must be <2s worse).
04 Commercial hypothesis
For the household: 'Arm it and forget the cat exists — alarms only for people.'