Mapped to a shared offline runtime family and usable with a recording or compatible ESP32 CSI stream.
Intended capability
Pilot this intended outcome through the shared Machine vibration family, then validate it against site-specific ground truth: Counts the arm's work cycles and tracks their period, settle time, and audio signature over weeks — conformance when the observed rhythm matches the declared program and takt, a maintenance cue when the same program's rhythm creeps. The robot's own cycle counter is self-report; this count is taken from the outside.
This describes the intended outcome. Readiness is shared-family mapped, evidence is class B, and a catalog mapping or recording is not proof of this outcome at a real site.
Solution blueprint
See the environment before installing it.
This exact kit is one of 191 first-class designs. It includes geometry, objects, nodes, wording, scenarios, installation, limitations, and catalog-bound readiness.
No rendered revision is available yet.
Bundled recording
A related Cobot scene
This is one recorded vertical scenario. It is not separate validation of every capability in the catalog.
01 The physics
A cycling arm writes a machine-regular motion envelope into the CSI field — metronomic period, near-zero jitter — and envelope autocorrelation recovers task periods from ~1 s to minutes, well under the 3.3 Hz Nyquist limit of the 6.6 Hz ambient rate. True micro-Doppler and joint vibration alias hopelessly at that rate and are not claimed; the honest observables are period, count, duty, and settle-interval length. The PDM mic carries what CSI cannot: servo-whine band energy (drive PWM carriers, commonly 4-16 kHz) and impact transients, whose slow centroid trends are the vibration-side drift channel.
02 Shared processing path
Per-slot CSI motion-envelope energy -> autocorrelation period tracker + cycle counter with jitter statistic -> per-cell EWMA baselines on period, duty, settle interval -> PDM band-energy centroid trend on the servo-whine band -> CUSUM on residual creep after reasoning-tier normalization against declared task mix (estate read-only) -> conformance/drift row with trend confidence.
This is a capability design path. Components may be shared with other catalog entries; it is not presented as a unique algorithm.
03 Validation plan
Own-rig protocol: metronome-driven arm proxy at fixed programs; count accuracy against ground truth over 1,000+ cycles; injected period drift (+2% per day) with detection latency measured; mic centroid tracked across artificial load changes; a scheduled correlation study against real maintenance outcomes is the gate for any predictive phrasing.
04 Commercial hypothesis
'Cycle Ledger' — for the line's maintenance planner: the arm's rhythm counted from outside, so takt conformance and creep no longer rest on the robot's own counter.